Criterion 1: Traffic Check
Evaluates the driver’s situational awareness and use of observation techniques to identify pedestrians, other vehicles, and blind spots.
1 (Poor): Fails to check mirrors or blind spots before moving. Ignores surrounding movement; relies solely on tech (reverse cameras) without physical “life-saver” glances.
2 (Below Average): Inconsistent observation. Checks one side but neglects the other. Late to react to approaching pedestrians or vehicles.
3 (Acceptable): Performs basic 360-degree checks. Uses mirrors effectively and identifies obvious hazards, but may miss smaller obstacles or fast-moving cyclists.
4 (Good): Proactive scanning. Monitors high-risk areas (e.g., between parked cars where children might emerge) and maintains eye contact with other drivers to establish right-of-way.
5 (Excellent): Continuous, systematic observation. Demonstrates “active looking” by rotating the head/torso to clear A-pillars and blind spots. Anticipates hazards before they enter the vehicle’s path.
Criterion 2: Driving Speed
Evaluates the driver’s ability to maintain a “walking pace” and adjust velocity based on the immediate environment and surface conditions.
1 (Poor): Excessive speed (e.g., over 15 mph/25 kph). Harsh acceleration or “jackrabbit” starts. Speed is inappropriate for the density of the lot.
2 (Below Average): Inconsistent speed control. Drives too fast for the narrowness of aisles or fails to slow down significantly at the end of rows/intersections.
3 (Acceptable): Maintains a steady, moderate pace (approx. 5–10 mph). Speed allows for a safe stop if a hazard appears, though braking may be slightly reactive.
4 (Good): Consistently maintains a low “walking pace.” Speed is proactively reduced at every “blind” corner or row exit without needing to be prompted.
5 (Excellent): Exceptional speed management. The vehicle is kept under 5 mph in high-pedestrian zones. Speed is adjusted flawlessly for surface hazards (speed bumps, ice, or oil spills) with no abrupt braking required.